Follow planning and zoning changes in your area — without checking every city website.
We monitor planning and zoning activity across the cities we cover, so you don’t have to. Track proposed developments and zoning changes in your metro, see who’s filing, review the source documents where available, and get email alerts for projects matching your selected locations and keywords.
The most recently processed rezonings across the metro whose hearing has passed or is not yet scheduled, as the packets state it.
Rezoning for Uptown Urban Village Transit Oriented Development, from Commerce Center (CC) District to Uptown Urban Village Northwest (UUV-NW) District.
Rezoning of approximately 1.6+ acres from Commerce Center (CC) to Uptown Urban Village Northwest (UUV-NW) District to enable a transit-oriented development. The applicant seeks to convert existing commercial zoning to a higher-density urban village designation to accommodate mixed-use development at 6301 NW 5 Way.
Rezoning for 8-unit single-family home subdivision, from AG (Agriculture) to R-1 (Estate Dwelling), 10 acres.
Emilka Investments, LLC proposes to rezone approximately 10 gross acres from Agriculture (AG) to Estate Dwelling (R-1) zoning to enable development of an 8-unit single-family home subdivision. Staff found the application complete and suitable for further review, and the proposed R-1 zoning is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan's Residential 1 DU/Acre designation, compatible with surrounding zoning, and not anticipated to adversely affect traffic, property values, or neighborhood living conditions.
Rezoning, from Agriculture (AG) District and Agricultural (A-1) District to Open Space Design Overlay District, 35.5 acres.
Rezoning of Bristol Reserve to convert 35.5 acres from agricultural zoning to Open Space Design Overlay District. This request was already approved by Town Council through Ordinance O-2022-010 on May 18, 2022.
Public Planning & Zoning agendas from 69 Miami municipalities, read as each packet is captured. We extract the cases our reader supports; coverage and field completeness vary by city and packet. Alerts follow the processing of a matching case. Coverage →
Follow a historical case from Plano, in our Dallas–Fort Worth coverage, from the city's records to its source packet, and note the questions to take back to the city or your client.
Watch the walkthrough · 2:34
Recorded September 2026 using historical records; the site may have changed since. Not a live feed.
You are a real estate broker, builder or land buyer, and a client asks: what is being proposed around this area? P&Z Radar helps you investigate planning and zoning records in the places it covers. Let’s use Plano as an example. We’ll find a case, inspect what the record says, and identify the questions worth taking back to the city or your client.
First, check coverage. A city name alone is not enough: look at the source status and when its portal was read. This tells you where to start and where gaps may remain. P&Z Radar works from captured public documents, so the timing and detail depend on the city’s records. Once you know your market is represented, you can make the search much more specific.
On Projects, choose Plano. The table gives you case identifiers, locations, types and available details. You can use the other filters to focus your research further. Notice the label: this public page is a historical archive, not the full stream of upcoming cases. It is useful for seeing the kind of information available and understanding activity already on file before you decide whether monitoring is right for you.
Open a case and read the fields in context. Who is named? What use is proposed? Which location and hearing date appear? Where is the source packet? Those are useful inputs to a client conversation or a research brief. A staff recommendation is not the same as a final decision. If a summary and a status disagree, go to the source and resolve that difference before repeating either as a fact.
For a broker, this might raise a question about activity near a listing. For a land team, it might identify a proposed use worth investigating. For an engineering firm, it might show an applicant or project type to research. The next step is not to assume the land is available or the project approved. It is to carry better questions and a source link into the next conversation.
If that research is useful, the free city trial is the next place to look. Its page explains the recent cases and follow-on updates you can evaluate without a card. Review the city you select and the current terms before starting. Begin with one market you know well, compare the records with the city’s own source, and judge whether this saves you useful research time. That is a practical way to test P&Z Radar.
Notice rarely reaches you. Where a city mails notice, it usually goes only to owners within a set distance of the site — often a few hundred feet, though the rule varies by state and city. Own land across the road or sit under contract nearby and you may be outside it, with no letter on the way.
The window can be short. Many cities post agendas close to their legal minimum, so a case can be filed, heard and decided between two weekly portal checks. Among the cases we processed before their hearing, the median advance notice is 5 days — a median across that population, not a promise for every case or city.
What that looks like: land going multi-family a block from your next closing; a neighbour assembling next to your holdings; a staff report recommending denial on a tract you’d buy at the right basis; a specific-use permit on the corner your listing faces.
First observation, hearing scheduled, continued, advanced from Planning & Zoning to Council — each stage as we observe it on the agendas.
We flag cases where the packet’s staff recommendation is denial, or that keep being continued. A switch sends you only those. That is a staff recommendation or a scheduling signal, not an official denial: we read agendas, not votes.
Add properties you own or have under contract and pick a radius. Anything filed near one is reported with its distance and the property it’s next to — whether or not it matches your keywords. Cities mail notice only to owners within a short statutory distance of a site, which varies by state; our default ring is 1,000 feet.
This replaces checking dozens of portals by hand and reading packets that run to hundreds of pages; a match reaches you as a short email once the captured packet is processed. Packets beyond our size limits are read as a bounded prefix.
|
Builders and development companies, brokers, land acquisition and assemblage teams, civil engineers and planners — and anyone following planning and zoning.
Rezonings and SUPs with acreage, requested zoning and petitioner as the packets list them, when the packet is captured — not when the sign goes up. A proposal is not an approval, and a staff recommendation is not a vote.
Know what’s moving around the property: case numbers, hearing dates, staff recommendations where stated.
Filings, what each city’s staff recommends, and how long items sit between stages. Outcomes are decided in minutes we don’t collect, so we won’t tell you what passed. Pull the same data by API and MCP.
Data centers are the largest land, power and construction decisions most cities will see this decade, and they surface first in the same public record as every other project: a rezoning or specific-use request, a site plan, a substation or transmission item on the agenda. P&Z Radar reads those filings and records each project’s stage and next public decision as the packets state them, linked to the packet.
The result: a searchable record of proposed campuses by metro — who is filing, where, what is requested, the staff recommendation where the packet states one, and when the commission and council meet — reviewed before publication. Track the projects that matter to you and get a short brief when something changes.
0 reviewed projects in Miami today; 31 across 7 metros; 1 reviewed policy item (ordinances, text amendments, moratoria) on the policy watch; 1 candidate awaiting review here. Each project is counted once from its reviewed records. These include historical proposals and requests to permit data-center use; the count does not establish committed development or construction.
For site selectors, utilities and suppliers, brokers and land teams, and local officials. A filing is a proposal until the commission votes and the site is permitted and built; we say what the record says and no more.
Teal = a city we hold tracked cases from; grey = on the expansion list or no tracked cases yet; a white dot is a community covered through its county’s portal. Click a dot for the city.
14 days free · $99/mo for one city, $599/mo for the whole metro · cancel anytime.
P&Z Radar AI agent · Expand
Hi, I’m Pip. How can I help?
